One Piece 1166 Manga Page 16

This is Page 16 of One Piece 1166, click or swipe the image to go to Page 17 of the manga. Ghost bullets that both hurt and demoralizes you? Damn. A true hero indeed. He couldn’t stand by seeing so many civilians die and he did not hesitate to threaten a superior to do what’s right and allow the survivors to board the ship. I like to also think that garp actually raised dragon right, instilling within him a strong sense of morality and humane justice. Garp ordered all survivors plus marines to get on the ship then leave. Catch the latest one piece manga 1166, check this blog regularly for the updates of one piece - chapter 1166: in Full Color & Ch 1166 100 out of 100 based on 5 ratings.

 One Piece 1166 スキャン- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

One Piece Chapter 1166 Online Page 16
 
One Piece 1166 漫画 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  
 
I meant he stayed in the navy to protect his fellow marines from whatever the freak the world government was cooking up. Dragon left the marines to protect everyone from the government, and likely because he saw the marines as largely complicit in what the government was doing. I mean, I think that it's a fair thing to want to understand the reasoning behind garp staying, at this point. Granted, garp started to hint at a reason in the chapter, but it would still be great to see him providing more explanation. In any case, given how fair such a desire for this expectation is, I don't think that labelling ths post as being related to "Garp hating" is warranted. But if it's not fair, then this changes the meaning of "Garp hater". I would have thought that this expression would be used to dismiss a person performing an unjustified attack on garp's character (as if only motivated by hate rather than reasonable doubt on the character's morals, from what we can see of their actions). But if the "Attack" (or, rather, the questioning of) is measured / nuanced / reasonable / proportionate to the character's actions seen so far, then this expression, with this meaning, is not warranted, and you just seem silly using it, don't you think?

No comments: